Pacing Distances
Pacing
In orienteering or treasure hunting, it is often valuable to count your paces in order to estimate the distance you've traveled in a certain direction. Knowing the length of your pace is useful for many things such as estimating the width or height of large objects such as trees, rivers, or cliffs. But, in wilderness hiking, I've actually found no real use yet for counting paces. I'd love to hear from you if you've used pacing for a real situation and I'll post it here.
Figuring Pace Length
To determine your pace:
- Accurately measure a distance - using a 100 yard (300 feet) football field is perfect.
- Walk the length of the field, counting each time your right foot steps down. Or, just your left foot if you prefer.
- Divide 300 feet by the number of paces you took and that is your pace length.
- It is a good idea to repeat this in the other direction and take an average.
Now that you know your pace length, you can estimate how far you hike. As you hike along, keep track of your paces. At any time, you can multiply your paces by your pace length to figure how far you've travelled.
But, here's why I personally don't find it very useful:
- Going uphill, downhill, across hill, through deep grass, over sand, through brush, over rocks all have an effect on shortening your pace.
- Wearing a backpack shortens your pace.
- Losing count of your paces means you go back and start over or guess and start again from your current spot.
- I'm in the wild to enjoy the wild, not count my steps.
- With my map and compass, I know where I'm going and about how far I have to go. I don't need to pace.
So, pacing is useful for competitions, for learning about how your body covers ground, and for doing specific distance estimating. It also may be useful if you ever become lost and have also lost your compass and map. In that case, you can estimate directions and then track how far you travel.
Next: Without a Compass
Where can you grow chili beans?
At the south pole! |
Search Google News for more 'Lost Hiker' news items. |
28 Oct 2024 - Rescuers call out for hiker missing for nearly 2 days. Then, a yell comes in darkness |
26 Oct 2024 - Man Was Missing for a Month in National Park, But His Mom Never Lost Hope. Then He Was Found Alive (Exclusive) |
29 Oct 2024 - Missing hiker found dead at Texas national park; here’s everything we know |
16 Oct 2024 - Missing Yellowstone hiker’s dad continues ground search without park’s OK for helicopter • Idaho Capital Sun |
28 Oct 2024 - Missing Hiker Found In San Diego County's Backcountry After 2 Days |
28 Oct 2024 - Lost hiker survives month |
Comments:
Oct 16, 2016 - Hame
Pacing: ideally referenced on a 100m stretch of flat but representative ground when carrying
a full pack, then remember you will shorten your pace uphill and lengthen downhill. Record
both tracks and open country. We used it in the Army for night nav without NVGs and an old
school golf stroke counter for paces was the best. [Rosary beads also work]. Good for when
you can't see much [fog, blizzard, cloud in the high country etc] or are in featureless terrain
without a reliable reference on the horizon. In the Iraq wars the ground was so flat the maps
may as well have been a sheet of sandpaper. Navigation was done like at sea; distance and
direction travelled from a start point checking with the sun at noon and the stars at night. No
currents/significant winds makes it easier unlike what our maritime and aviation colleagues
face.
Mar 20, 2017 - CaptanAJI agree with Hame. Although not practical/essential with all
land nav applications (nowadays, I rarely find myself using, or
even needing a pace count with the majority of back country
stuff I do for fun), pacing was extremely useful and necessary
for tackling some military land navigation applications,
especially when dealing with low visibility, limited to no
points of reference/terrain features, etc., as previously
mentioned. Also, using a pace counter (a.k.a. "Ranger Beads"),
small stones, or other means for keeping tabs on paces/distance
covered meant that losing your pacing count was pretty much a
non-issue.
To the author's point, pace counting is probably not something most will use, nor even need to worry about based most general back country map and compass hiking-around applications. But, nonetheless, if you understand and can effectively use pacing, that's just one more nugget of knowledge and skill you'll have under your belt should you ever need to rely on it.
Jun 11, 2018 - Kirby SpencerTo the author's point, pace counting is probably not something most will use, nor even need to worry about based most general back country map and compass hiking-around applications. But, nonetheless, if you understand and can effectively use pacing, that's just one more nugget of knowledge and skill you'll have under your belt should you ever need to rely on it.
I have used it in flat country with low visibility. But the more
practical application is to know when you have overshot a backstop.
If you have triangulated a position on a map, and know that a N/S
road is one half mile east, and you pace off 0.6 miles and you have
still not hit the road, you probably have mis-identified one or
more of your landmarks and/or laid it down on the map incorrectly.
Apr 26, 2019 - Brent WardI am new to orienteering, but myself and a team used pace
counting to find controls on a permanent orienteering trail
yesterday.
That was the hardest part -- finding the control after we hit our attack point/nearby landmark. It was particularly hard when the control was in non-descript forest.
I found pace counting was good over short distances to help us narrow the search area for the control. But I found it was pretty inaccurate over distances of about 60 to 90 paces. Probably because we measured our stride on pavement and then used the stride measurement in underbrush and rougher terrain.
Aug 16, 2019 - S That was the hardest part -- finding the control after we hit our attack point/nearby landmark. It was particularly hard when the control was in non-descript forest.
I found pace counting was good over short distances to help us narrow the search area for the control. But I found it was pretty inaccurate over distances of about 60 to 90 paces. Probably because we measured our stride on pavement and then used the stride measurement in underbrush and rougher terrain.
I have successfully used pacing to find a geocache that was 30 metres away from a known starting point (a particular tree along side the trail that i predicted i would be able to find) in a wooded area, without a GPS and with only a hand drawn map that i'd copied from google maps. closer to home, I use it to answer questions like which bus stop is nearer to my home or which is the shortest route to the laundromat.
Ask a Question
More Map and Compass Resources at CompassDude.com
Recent Comments